> Patch 568629 removes the built-in module new (with sincere apologies > to Tommy Burnette ;-) and replaces it with a tiny Python module > consisting of a single import statement: I'm reviewing it now. It seems it's your patch. Did you forget to mention that in this message? > Now, what about the types module? It has been suggested that this > module should be deprecated. I think it still has some use: we need > a place to put all the types that are not used often enough to be > added to the builtins. I suggest that they be placed in the module > 'types' with names matching their __name__ attribute. The types > module will still have the long MixedCaseType names for backward > compatibility. The use of the long names should be deprecated, not > the types module itself. Not a bad idea. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4