That's great, Fred. You might also want to add the "Return value: New reference." riff to PyObject_RichCompare; I missed that when looking at the existing doc for examples. -Dave From: "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org> > > David Abrahams writes: > > I wasn't aware of how it would be formatted when I submitted my > > PyObject_RichCompare patches. I think the different italic "op" usages are > > too similar. Probably \emph should be replaced with something that > > bold-ifies. > > Bold is the wrong thing. I propose: > > - change the argument name to "opid" > - let the "op" stand-in show in the code font so it contrasts with the > o1 and o2 references in the \samp. > > Here's what it looks like: > > http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/api/object.html#l2h-170 > > If that works for you, let me know and I'll update the 2.2.x docs and > commit the changes. > > Thanks for your comments! > > > -Fred > > -- > Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> > PythonLabs at Zope Corporation >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4