On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Skip Montanaro wrote: > If the extra complexity came with no added benefits I'd agree with you. > However, most makes actually do support a fairly basic common syntax. Who > cares about %-rules and suffix rules? Those are only there to make it > easier for humans to maintain Makefiles Just generate a brute-force > low-level makefile. Distutils will then do the right thing in the face of > file edits. If you're not using sophisticated rules, the job make does is probably no more complicated than the job of generating a makefile. You just construct a dependency graph, then walk over it stat-ing the files, and running rules where needed. It's a SMOP ;-) -- Greg Ball
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4