[Tim] > 1. You really want PyObject_RichCompareBool in your example, not > PyObject_RichCompare. The former is much more efficient in some > cases (e.g., a total ordering on dicts is much hairer to determine > than just equality). [David Abrahams] > Now you're really pulling my leg. PyObject_RichCompareBool is just: > ... > How can that be more efficient that PyObject_RichCompare? I wasn't pulling your leg there, I was simply wrong. Who can blame me? You never documented this stuff <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4