A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-June/025230.html below:

[Python-Dev] Negative long literals (was Re: Does Python need a '>>>' operator?)

[Python-Dev] Negative long literals (was Re: Does Python need a '>>>' operator?) [Python-Dev] Negative long literals (was Re: Does Python need a '>>>' operator?)Tim Peters tim.one@comcast.net
Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:16:51 -0400
I think Beni has a very nice idea here, especially for people who can't
visualize 2's-complement (not mentioning Guido by name <wink>).

-----Original Message-----
From: Beni Cherniavksy <cben@tx.technion.ac.il>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:57 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Does Python need a '>>>' operator?


... [quotes of old postings deleted] ...

I just got another idea: use 0x1234 for 0-filled numbers and 1xABCD for
1-filled ones.  That way you impose no restrictions on what follows the
prefix and keep backward compatibility.  0xFFFFFFFF stays a 2^n-1
_positive_ number, as it should be.  The look of 1x is weird at first but
it is very logical...

--
Beni Cherniavsky <cben@tx.technion.ac.il>

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list





RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4