> What binary compatibility ? I thought we had given that idea > up after 1.5.2 was out the door (which is also why the Windows > distutils installers are very picky about the Python version > to install an extension for). You keep saying this, and I keep denying it. In everything I do I try to remain binary compatible in struct layout and function signatures. Can you point to a document that records a decision to the contrary? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4