[cleaning out some old mail...] Zooko wrote: > So in terms of `trace.py', it is a widely useful tool and > already has a programmatic interface. Being added to the > hallowed Python Standard Library would be a major step up in > publicity and hence usage. It would require better docs > regarding the programmatic usage. Skip wrote: > It's speed cries out for a rewrite of some sort. I haven't > thought about it, but I wonder if it could be layered on top of > hotshot. Jeremy Hylton writes: > Can any of the handler methods be re-coded in C? The hotshot changes > allow you to install a C function as a trace hook, but doesn't the > trace function in trace.py do a fair amount of work? Another possibility is to use _hotshot.coverage() instead of the "normal" profiler in HotShot. This records the enter/exit events and SET_LINENO instructions, but doesn't take any timing measurements, so operates much quicker than profiling. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4