On Sat, Jun 01, 2002, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > If you're hacking on it, it's probably easier to split the code up. > > Hm, that's not how I tend to hack on things (except when working with > others who like that style). Why do you find hacking on several > (many?) small files easier for you than on a single large file? > Surely not because loading a large file (in the editor, or in Python) > takes too long? That was in the 80s. :-) Is it because multiple > Emacs buffers allow you to maintain multiple current positions, with > all the context that that entails? Or is it something else? s/Emacs/vi sessions/ Yes. -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "In the end, outside of spy agencies, people are far too trusting and willing to help." --Ira Winkler
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4