> > Could also just have one acquire function that indicates whether it > > is read-write or read-only via a return parameter. > > That loses the (weak) symmetry with the existing API. > There's nothing a client expecting a read/write pointer could do with a read only pointer IMO. > > Is write-only ever useful? > > No, write implies read. Should it be named getfixedreadwritebuffer then? Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4