----- Original Message ----- From: "Guido van Rossum" <guido@python.org> To: "Thomas Heller" <thomas.heller@ion-tof.com> Cc: "Scott Gilbert" <xscottg@yahoo.com>; "Neil Hodgson" <nhodgson@bigpond.net.au>; <python-dev@python.org> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] pre-PEP: The Safe Buffer Interface > > > If an object's buffer isn't allocated for the object's life > > > when the object is created, it should not support the "safe" version > > > of the protocol (maybe a different name would be better), and users > > > should not release the GIL while using on to the pointer. > > > > 'Persistent' buffer interface? Too long? > > No, persistent typically refers to things that survive longer than a > process. Maybe 'static' buffer interface would work. > "cautious"? regards ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Holden http://www.holdenweb.com/ Python Web Programming http://pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4