--- Thomas Heller and Guido wrote: > > > > If an object's buffer isn't allocated for the object's life > > > > when the object is created, it should not support the "safe" > > > > version of the protocol (maybe a different name would be better), > > > > and users should not release the GIL while using on to the pointer. > > > > > > 'Persistent' buffer interface? Too long? > > > > No, persistent typically refers to things that survive longer than a > > process. Maybe 'static' buffer interface would work. > > I'll just chime in with the name "Fixed" Buffer Interface. They aren't really static either, and fixed applies in at least two senses. :-) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4