> > > If an object's buffer isn't allocated for the object's life > > > when the object is created, it should not support the "safe" version > > > of the protocol (maybe a different name would be better), and users > > > should not release the GIL while using on to the pointer. > > > > 'Persistent' buffer interface? Too long? > > No, persistent typically refers to things that survive longer than a > process. Maybe 'static' buffer interface would work. > Ahem, right. Maybe Barry can change it before committing this? Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4