> Even if I'm wrong about the need for this, at the very least, the > additional functionality can be added later. I really just want to push > through a simple, usable, bytes object for the time being. We can easily > add, we can't easily take away. Hi Scott, I've followed this discussion and it looks like the PEP is ready for another round of refinements based upon the discussion (e.g. to use size_t). Do you have time to do that? And then the next thing would be a prototype implementation. I like where this is going! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4