> If you only have ten seconds read this: > --------------------------------------- > > Guido, i believe i understand your position. My interpretation is: > > I'd like "iterate destructively" and "iterate non-destructively" > to be spelled differently. You don't. > > I'd like to be able to establish conventions so that "x in y" > doesn't destroy y. This isn't so important to you. > > We have a difference of opinion. I don't think we have a failure in > understanding. If the opinions won't change, we might as well move on. > I did not mean to waste your time, only to achieve understanding. Aye, aye, Sir. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4