A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-July/026747.html below:

[Python-Dev] Review of build system patch requested

[Python-Dev] Review of build system patch requestedNeal Norwitz neal@metaslash.com
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 21:04:13 -0400
Mark Hammond wrote:
> 
> > > * Makefile.pre.in has been changed to pass "-DPy_BUILD_CORE" to
> > the compiler
> > > when building Python itself and any builtin modules.  This flag is
> > > not passed to extension modules.
> >
> > My only concern would be that tools which parse the Makefile (I
> > believe distutils does this?) should not accidentally pick up the
> > "-DPy_BUILD_CORE" flag.
> 
> Thanks Guido.  I mailed the distutils sig, and Andrew Kuchling replied that
> my change should be safe.
> 
> Now I need some help checking this baby in!  My change touches
> Makefile.pre.in and configure.in, and require that both "autoheader" and
> "autoconf" be run to correctly regenerate output files.
> 
> How should I do this checkin?  Is it necessary for me to perform any
> additional steps, or is there some magic that allows me to simply check
> these 2 files in and have everything else work?

I regenerated configure and Makefile.pre.in and attached it 
to the patch.  While regenerating I got a warning:

	autoheader: missing template: _XOPEN_SOURCE

It would be good to have someone look over/test the new configure, etc.

Neal




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4