> What about: > > "...sequences. Note that the act of looking at an iterator's > elements mutates the iterator." That doesn't belong in the spec either -- nothing requires an iterator to have mutable state, let alone to mutate it when next() is called.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4