>>>>> "MAL" == mal <M.-A.> writes: MAL> The configure script tests whether static forwards work or MAL> not. If you'd rip out the test as well, then I'd have to add MAL> those platforms which still have problems manually. MAL> The problem is: I don't know which platforms these are (because MAL> configure found these itself). >> >> If you think the configure test works, why do you have platform >> specific ifdefs in your header file? MAL> Because it doesn't always work :-) Let's make sure I've got this straight: You believe there are platforms on which staticforward is necessary, because you can not have a tentative definition of a static followed by a definition with an initializer. Yet the configure test of exactly this behavior succeeds. Further, you don't believe the configure test works but you want us to leave it in anyway? Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4