Ka-Ping: > is it > acceptable to write an iterator that only provides <next> if you > only care about the "iteration protocol" and not the "for-able > protocol"? Probably just as acceptable as writing a file object that only provides some of the file methods. Seems quite Pythonic to me. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4