> I don't think it is too late. 90% ++ of the python code base out > there doesn't use iterators yet... people are still wrapping their > minds around it to see how they can use it in their applications. > If it was publicly stated that this could be "fixed" in the next > version I don't think that it would hurt. These things happen, > and sometimes its best to "roll back". Programmers understand this. I find this really hard to believe, given that such a big deal has been made of iterators. Care to conduct a survey on c.l.py? Given that it's really only a very minor problem, I'd rather not expend the effort to 'fix" this. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4