> Note that Python identifiers are restricted to the ASCII > subset of the encoding, and thus need no further conversion > after step 4. > > Could identifiers be produced according to the usual syntax (letters or > underscore, then letters, digits and underscore), but without going to > ASCII first? [...] > We should try not missing the opportunity, if it happens to exist now. To the contrary, I wish GNU readline didn't call setlocale(). Allowing non-ASCII identifiers may eventually happen, but there are lots of reasons why it's a bad idea (such as source code portability), and tying such a proposal to this PEP is definitely the wrong thing. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4