>>>>> "CC" == Clark C <cce@clarkevans.com> writes:
CC> Even if write accepts a string it may not do what you expect.
CC> *grin*
Very true. It's the best we can do now, but we can do better by
<surprise> being more explicit. :)
CC> Well, with the Object Adaptation proposal you don't even need
CC> to bless a particular compliance mechanism. For ease of use,
CC> the built-in may want to use a few mechanisms; but this is a
CC> distinct difference. What ever is chosen, I hope the core
CC> syntax isn't mucked with!
Me too! I need to go re-read that PEP now.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4