On Mon, Jul 15, 2002, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > (b) implement (and document!) the "sink-state" rule from the PEP. > > If we end up adopting (b), what can we do to Python 2.2 that doesn't > break the "bug-fixes-only" promise of that branch? Well, from my POV, given that the PEP is mostly clear about the intent, fixing the implementation to match the PEP precisely matches the "bug-fix only" rule. We've been trying to move away from "reference defined by implementation", and this seems like a perfect opportunity to exercise it. -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Project Vote Smart: http://www.vote-smart.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4