[Alex Martelli] > What about the following compromise: there are two set types, > ImmutableSet and MutableSet, with a common supertype Set. > ... This sounds fine to me, except I'd call them Set (mutable) and something else <wink>. I'd also check the code into the library now, so lots of people can hack on it before it "becomes real". People just won't play with branches or sandboxes in sufficient numbers to do any collaborative good. If Guido hates what it turns into, we can pull it out again.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4