[Michael McLay] > ... > I had also read the following message and made the unfortunate > assumption that you were proposing "new" as the name of a new top level > module to contain all the standard python modules. Note that "new" is already the name of a top-level module, and has been for years. That other thread was about drawing useless distinctions between the already-existing "new" and "types" modules with respect to where to house new type names that nobody needs <0.9 wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4