> I'm not too interested in this anymore (I _was_ a year ago, IIRC). > I have given up using the buffer object myself, I've written > my own (maybe in the same way as others). Right. > > Maybe the name 'buffer' suggests false expectations? It's not a > > buffer, it's an alias for a memory area. > > > Hm. The name could be right (and I cold give up my own memory > object) if there were a way to create a buffer owning it's > own memory. Maybe your memory object could become a standard Python extension. Extra points if it works well with the memmap and the array modules. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4