I'm not too interested in this anymore (I _was_ a year ago, IIRC). I have given up using the buffer object myself, I've written my own (maybe in the same way as others). > Maybe the name 'buffer' suggests false expectations? It's not a > buffer, it's an alias for a memory area. > Hm. The name could be right (and I cold give up my own memory object) if there were a way to create a buffer owning it's own memory. > Maybe we should do something stronger, and deprecate the buffer type > altogether. Or this. Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4