[David Abrahams] >>> Just addressing the <0.1 wink> you left out: even if I get the include >>> order "right", my users are still screwed if they don't do it the >>> same way. >> Give them a pythonboost.h instead that contains the includes in >> the right order, or make your boost.h smarter, or ... > You fixed the LONGLONG_MAX stuff already, so I don't think > there's anything to discuss here, is there? I thought you thought there was, else there was no apparent reason for the "Just addressing" message I replied to. BTW, do you need this in 2.2.2 too, or is 2.3 good enough? I didn't change anything on the 2.2 branch.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4