From: "Tim Peters" <tim.one@comcast.net> > In any case, it's too much > fiddling just to save you the effort of ordering a pair of includes > consistently <0.9 wink>. Just addressing the <0.1 wink> you left out: even if I get the include order "right", my users are still screwed if they don't do it the same way. -Dave
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4