From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> > "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams@rcn.com> writes: > > > #include <limits.h> > > # if !defined(BOOST_MSVC) && !defined(__BORLANDC__) \ > > && (defined(ULLONG_MAX) || defined(ULONG_LONG_MAX) || > > defined(ULONGLONG_MAX)) > > # define BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG > > #endif > [...] > > I'm surprised it wasn't a > > worse problem with MSVC6, because after all, it doesn't even supply a type > > called "long long". > > Could that have resulted from defining BOOST_MSVC? Sorry, I don't understand the question. Could *what* have resulted from defining BOOST_MSVC? -Dave
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4