[Oren Tirosh] > ... > This version, like the previous one, does not support indirect > interning of strings. Is there any evidence that this optimization is > still important? Nothing in the Python distribution itself needs it. We've already been thru the last part at length: indirect interning wasn't targeted at the core, so that the core doesn't need it is evidence of no more than that Guido's implementation worked as he intended it to in this respect. It would help if you could get Marc-Andre and /F to pronounce on whether their code benefits from it -- they're the most prolific extension authors we've got.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4