> > > > > types-sig > > > > +1 > > > > > > -1. I think there may come interesting discussions on this list, > > > when the time is due and things come up. Why dismiss it? It is > > > a good place to have. > > > > > > Sverker Nilsson > > Plus, if you dismiss it I might be tempted to bring my thread about > multimethods/overload resolution back to this list, and that would be > messy... it was so neatly killed by diverting it to types-sig. ;-) > > -Dave I apologize for that! I had expected that some people on the type-sig who would be interested. But it proves that the types-sig is dead. It's had its chance. If there's really a need to revive it, well, there's a procedure for reviving SIG, too. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4