Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-July/026255.html below:

[Python-Dev] The C API and wide unicode support

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] The C API and wide unicode support
• Next message: [Python-Dev] The C API and wide unicode support
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Any C function that uses Unicode objects in any way needs name
> mangling, because the storage layout of the Unicode objects
> changes.

Really?  If I am only using the published APIs and not peeking
directly inside the Unicode object, why should I care about its
internal lay-out?

Shouldn't only functions whose signature uses PY_UNICODE_TYPE be
name-mangled?  What am I missing?

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] The C API and wide unicode support
• Next message: [Python-Dev] The C API and wide unicode support
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4