"Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote:
> "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal@lemburg.com> writes:
>
> > For cases like the email package or distutils, I think it's
> > perfectly OK to only provide the updates for older Python
> > releases as separate download. Both have their own way of
> > life, so IMHO this is acceptable.
>
> In neither case, this is really possible: Once you have the package in
> the Python core, a separate installation in site-packages cannot
> override the core implementation.
This might sound clueless, but wouldn't it be a good idea to change that?
So that site-packages comes before Lib/ in sys.path?
Gerhard
--
mail: gerhard.haering@gmx.de registered Linux user #64239
web: http://www.cs.fhm.edu/~ifw00065/ OpenPGP public key id 86AB43C0
public key fingerprint: DEC1 1D02 5743 1159 CD20 A4B6 7B22 6575 86AB 43C0
reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4