"Tim Peters" <tim@zope.com> writes: > [Tim Peters] > > but since we never test without it the ability to compile it out > > isn't much of "a feature". > > [Martijn Faassen] > > If the problem is you don't have time to test it, > > That's not a problem for me. In context, it was just one more reason why > keeping WITH_CYCLE_GC has become a poor idea at best. > > > what about talking to the Snake Farm people of the Python Business > > Forum? > > > > http://www.lysator.liu.se/~sfarmer/ > > > > They may be able and willing to help. > > This would be a good idea for an "optional feature" somebody actually wants. > For example, is HAVE_UNICODE actually turned off out in the world? I build 3 debug builds (ucs2, ucs4 and without unicode) and run the test suites every night on linux/x86. test_unicode still fails in ucs4 builds... Cheers, M. -- For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4