Martin v. Loewis wrote: > "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal@lemburg.com> writes: > > >>I don't think that porting to a new platform falls under >>this definition, a new encoding might (but then only if the encoding >>is so popular that people consider its absence a bug) > > > Here we go. If "many people consider absence of foo a bug" is enough > to allow for a change, I can backport any change if I only find enough > people to testify that absence of that change is a bug... No, I was not talking about a missing foo; the comment was specifically about an encoding. Adding a new encoding would not need applications to be changed since the encoding information is part of the processed data. Anyway, if this confuses too much, simply go for the more restrictive: no new features at all paradigm. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH _______________________________________________________________________ eGenix.com -- Makers of the Python mx Extensions: mxDateTime,mxODBC,... Python Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4