On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Oren Tirosh wrote: > > It appears that what you are proposing is what interned string > > comparison already does (since == checks for pointer equality first). > > But INequality checking may still require strcmp. Inverse logic again. I never claimed it wouldn't. All i'm saying is that string comparison already does this: compare pointers, then if not equal, compare strings. > > So, the only observable effect of the change would be to break all > > code that tests for type(s) == str. > > Yes, that's certainly a problem. But you haven't responded to my point. Would there be *any* effect other than breakage? -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4