On 1 Jul 2002 at 15:15, Fredrik Lundh wrote: [complaints about SF bug tracker] > or better, join the roundup team, and make sure > it's good enough to replace the SF tracker. (as far > as I know, it already is -- but someone still needs > to set it up, write a script that pulls all data out > of the old system, etc). Someone is setting it up, and has written those scripts. A working demo (populated with PythonLabs history) should soon be available. I have to say that my "good enough" has been focussed on funtionality more than usability. I've never noticed any particular[1] difficulty in using the SF tracker to enter or post info on a bug, so François probably has a different "good enough" :-). -- Gordon http://www.mcmillan-inc.com/ [1] Writing an app as a set of cgi's is a fast way to write a mediocre GUI. Writing a *good* GUI in this environment is extremely difficult and ugly, because you end up with lots of just-barely-portable- by-any-definition-thereof javascript, and Aahz is left out in the cold. Oh well, at least no one had a requirement that it be usable throught their cell phone...
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4