[Oleg Broytmann] > On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 04:32:35PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote: > > Attaching new info to a shared bug report is much more effective. You know, it is only effective when it works! The SF tracker did not work for me. I filed a bug, and checked it was correctly saved (through tedious paging all over). Then, much later, I received a message from a maintainer saying that my report was empty. It surely was not after I filed it. I guess the SF tracker works only for those using it very often :-). > Ah, I see now. I am strictly attached to email and email archives, and I > am always hating web-based collaboration tools, but you made a good point. > Still, life is too short to spend it in the SF slooow interface :( Slow, hardly usable, and not even dependable. Email might be less black-holish, after all. Moreover, most people (maintainers included) know how to read and file an email. I've a hard time believing people who tell me that maintainers are unable to sort emails without loosing them, or that I can really sort their own email better than they can. I usually praise maintainers as intelligent people. :-) -- François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4