On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 04:32:35PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Oleg Broytmann]
> > I think I can reduce this, but I am afraid the data structure
> > still will be large,
>
> That doesn't matter. It's the amount of *code* we don't understand and have
> to learn that matters. If you could reduce this to a gigabyte of pickle
> input that we only need to feed into pickle, that would be great.
Ok. From today I have a lot of spare time and very good almost free
Internet connection, so I can investigate things. I can post the results of
my investigation to the developers list or to the c.l.py, if anyone is
interested.
> > That what I don't want to do - file a mysterious bug report.
>
> That's what bug reports are best for!
Hmm, I thought they are not, as those mysterious bug reports take up
space and time - someone have to read it, at least; but they are not help
in any way.
> Now you've got comments about your
> bug scattered across comp.lang.python and python-dev, and nobody will be
> able to find them again. Attaching new info to a shared bug report is much
> more effective.
Ah, I see now. I am strictly attached to email and email archives, and I
am always hating web-based collaboration tools, but you made a good point.
Still, life is too short to spend it in the SF slooow interface :(
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd@phd.pp.ru
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4