Thanks, that was the info I needed. I'll work on trying to create a small program that people can run. It is not *completely* unreproduceable. I have found three different filings about this floating around in various places. I will collect the references tomorrow and put them into the main bug report. -a On 1 Jul 2002, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > "Andrew P. Lentvorski" <bsder@mail.allcaps.org> writes: > > > What is it's status? Is there a workaround? What is the diagnosis? > > The status is that it is unreproducable. I just tried with the Python > 2.2. Unless there is some independent verification of the problem, I'm > going to close it as unreproducable. > > Regards, > Martin >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4