On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:17:54AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> Ug. t'' strings have been discussed before w.r.t. i18n markup, but I
> don't like it.
>>>>> "JE" == Jeff Epler <jepler@inetnebr.com> writes:
JE> ... and you like $'' strings?
No! :)
JE> That suggestion was intended to bring a bad taste to
JE> *everybody*'s mouth, as much as t'' alone does to yours.
Ah, no wonder I've had to drink 3 sodas today. I wondered what that
foul flavor was, especially since I made sure to brush my teeth this
morning!
JE> (Hmm, and then I might need a raw unicode interpolated
JE> translated string ... is that spelled $_ur'' or r_$u'' ?)
Exactly why I'm against adding more string prefixes. Remember that
the _ thingie we currently recommend for gettext /isn't/ prefix
proliferation. E.g.:
_(u'translate this')
_(ru'and this')
It's just a function call with a convenient name (and even that's just
a convention, of course).
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4