Ping wrote:
> > Consider:
> >
> > def f(str):
> > # The argument 'str' masks the builtin str() function.
> > a, b = find_stuff(str)
> > print $'a = $a, b = $b'
> > return a, b
> >
> > It should be specified that $-strings do not use the local
> > "str" and "unicode" names to find str() and unicode()
>
> Good point. Perhaps it is better to simply describe a
> transformation using '%s' and '%' instead of 'str' and '+'
> to avoid this potential confusion altogether.
I thought about this; but I don't know if there's a '%'
equivalent for the unicode handling.
$u'uni${a}ode'
---> (u'uni' + unicode(a) + u'ode')
---> u'uni%???ode' % (a,)
I don't think %s does it. Maybe there's some format spec
flag that I'm forgetting.
## Jason Orendorff http://www.jorendorff.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4