>> Did she try Skip's suggestion to try pymalloc?
amk> She hasn't compiled it herself yet, but that's the first thing I'll
amk> try.
I did try that when the problem was first raised. I just tried it again.
It did have a positive effect:
w/ threads and w/o pymalloc:
user system elapsed CPU
7.64 0.72 0:09.73 85%
7.86 0.45 0:08.66 95%
7.66 0.66 0:08.32 99%
w/o threads and w/ pymalloc:
user system elapsed CPU
5.44 0.58 0:06.85 87%
5.57 0.46 0:06.02 100%
5.57 0.45 0:06.02 99%
The above was with my memory usage trimmed about as far down as I could get
it (turned off X, for example). My apologies that both sets of numbers
don't have threads disabled. It's just what I happened to have laying
around on the disk.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4