W li¶cie z nie, 06-01-2002, godz. 04:26, Guido van Rossum pisze: > FYI, I've checked in Sean's RPM spec file and the patches under > Misc/RPM/, replacing the previous (outdated) contents there. thank you very much: this is what suits me best - I prefer the specfile in the main tarfile (AND cvs). In this way if building RPM-s doesn't work I can always build it in the 'classic' way but still I don't have to wait for the src.rpms to appear (don't want to say that this is the case with Python releases, but generarly I prefer original tarballs _with_ rpm specs to src.rpms with nobody-knows-what-changes-applied). thanks and best regards -- Marek Pêtlicki <marpet@linuxpl.org> Linux User ID=162988
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4