From: Samuele Pedroni <pedroni@inf.ethz.ch> > Another maybe valuable thing: > > probably another useful heuristic > to divided the open PEPs > beyond proof-of-concept/no-proof-of-concept > > is new-syntax/new-keywords/new-"funny"-semantics/ > non-backward compatible > > vs. infrastructure/library/etc/BDFL championed > > Those PEPs espacially make peope wonder: > will that happen to my favorite language, > oh god, when?, it seems real soon now - gulp, gasp. > Clearly my point is not against "disruptive" changes but about making clear for people what is ongoing-work-in-progress and what is still just undecided. regarfs, Samuele Pedroni.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4