"M.-A. Lemburg" <mal@lemburg.com> writes: > Which wrapper APIs do we currently have which could actually > be made part of the Python core ? On Unix, we have iconv(3). On Windows, we have MultiByteToWideChar, which would need to be wrapped with a map translating codec names to codepage numbers. There is also a codec API through a COM interface provided by Internet Exploder; I don't have the name of that interface right now. On all platforms, we could easily wrap the Tcl encodings, which are available everywhere where Python is available. Not sure what the performance implications would be. There also could be a wrapper around ICU. On OS X, CFStringCreateFromExternalRepresentation could be used. > Aside: while it's true that we could use those, the Unicode > implementation has shown that rolling our own has worked out > quite well too. There have been a few correctness glitches in those, but overall, I'd agree that they have worked quite well. Performance is a different issue, though; people just haven't complained, yet, IMO. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4