M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
> I consider the above PEP ready for review by the developers.
> Please comment.
>
> http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0263.html
After looking at several PEPs over the last couple of days, I suggest
that PEP 1 be updated to require inclusion of the Last-Modified:
field. At the very least, I suggest that Post-History: be checked more
rigorously. (PEP 263 contains a Post-History: field, but it is blank.)
I don't think it's necessary to retrofit every PEP, but I think that
every PEP up for consideration should be required to comply.
--
--- Aahz (@pobox.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista
We must not let the evil of a few trample the freedoms of the many.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4