> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Guido Van Rossum wrote: > > > Given the number of OS/2 EMX specific changes to > > dynload_shlib.c, wouldn't it be better to create a > > separate dynload_os2.c? > > Its just occurred to me that you might in fact be referring to the changes > to import.c, which were in the same commit (& thus the same checkin > message) and were extensive. I did try to make it clear in the checkin > message that changes to multiple files were committed. > > It seems to be de rigeur to commit a single file at a time; something I > hadn't appreciated and don't remember being advised about. I will follow > this practive from now on. No need -- you're right, I mistook the diff, but that's purely my fault. Multi-file commits are quite common when they're related. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4