On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Guido Van Rossum wrote:
> Given the number of OS/2 EMX specific changes to
> dynload_shlib.c, wouldn't it be better to create a
> separate dynload_os2.c?
Its just occurred to me that you might in fact be referring to the changes
to import.c, which were in the same commit (& thus the same checkin
message) and were extensive. I did try to make it clear in the checkin
message that changes to multiple files were committed.
It seems to be de rigeur to commit a single file at a time; something I
hadn't appreciated and don't remember being advised about. I will follow
this practive from now on.
--
Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au | Snail: PO Box 370
andymac@pcug.org.au | Belconnen ACT 2616
Web: http://www.andymac.org/ | Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4