"Martin v. Loewis" wrote: > > barry@zope.com (Barry A. Warsaw) writes: > > > I don't think it works for XEmacs. I've got a MULE-aware XEmacs > > 21.4.6 and while it asks if I want to set the local variables in the > > -*- line, I still see "Raw" in the modeline, and I see the following > > letters in print string (with funny little lines above the > > characters): iAOOEI. See attached capture. That doesn't seem right, > > does it? > > Indeed not: It interprets it as latin-1. I hope XEmacs will eventually > follow the GNU Emacs conventions here, since I think they are useful. After reading some of the Emacs docs, I think we should allow a more flexible coding line: -*- ... coding: (\w+) ... -*- because you will sometimes want to add more variables to that Emacs init line than just the encoding declaration. Does anybody know where XEmacs is moving w/r to this ? (and for that matter what about vi, vim, etc. ?) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4